Homesteading Today

Homesteading Today (http://www.homesteadingtoday.com/)
-   General Chat (http://www.homesteadingtoday.com/general-chat/)
-   -   Starbucks - No Guns please (http://www.homesteadingtoday.com/specialty-forums/general-chat/495961-starbucks-no-guns-please.html)

mnn2501 09/18/13 11:00 AM

Starbucks - No Guns please
 
Starbucks CEO writes:
Quote:

I am writing today with a respectful request that customers no longer bring firearms into our stores or outdoor seating areas.
---
For those who champion “open carry,” please respect that Starbucks stores are places where everyone should feel relaxed and comfortable. The presence of a weapon in our stores is unsettling and upsetting for many of our customers.
---
The company said it plans to buy ad space to publish the letter on Thursday in The New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and USA Today.
Not sure how many here visit Starbucks, I very seldom do however this loses any of my future business.
Also: Where is 'open carry' legal in the U.S.?

simi-steading 09/18/13 11:04 AM

Legal to open carry here.. They have monthly get togethers in this area at Starbucks... Not often I see people in this area open carrying, but I have seen a few that do... I don't for the simple fact it's too crowded around this area, and all the self serving in this area get all twitchy about it and cause you problems.. like calling the cops.. CCW is much easier..

BTW... Different maps for different kinds of open carry... http://www.opencarry.org/?page_id=101

emdeengee 09/18/13 11:15 AM

Private business can set the standards they want. People can choose to support it or not.

simi-steading 09/18/13 11:27 AM

Starbucks said they will ask not to bring them, but they won't ask you to leave if you do, so long as it's legal in the state..

Personally,. I feel safer around a person open carrying.. tells me that more than likely, they are pretty stable and I won't need to worry about getting shot by them.. .

TripleD 09/18/13 11:32 AM

Open carry is legal here . I do it in warm weather and conceal in cold weather.

CraterCove 09/18/13 11:47 AM

The reason people feel unsettled or disturbed by people carrying weapons is because not enough of us are doing it on a regular basis. We need to be asserting this right and desensitizing other people to it so they don't freak out.

Maybe over time it will wake up a few zombies.

simi-steading 09/18/13 12:04 PM

I've open carried around WV, but in this really crowded area I'm in now, it's just not worth all the headaches.. but you're danged skippy I CC...

plowjockey 09/18/13 12:06 PM

Who doesn't want a $4 cup of coffee? :rolleyes:

It's a publicity stunt, IMO but is another good reason not to go there

bluemoonluck 09/18/13 12:15 PM

Add Starbucks to Buffalo Wild Wings on the list of places I used to patronize but won't anymore!

My DH is a cop, he always carries. Even when he's off duty, if he sees a crime in progress anywhere in our state he's REQUIRED to attempt to stop it. You bet your butt he always has at least one gun on his person!

wy_white_wolf 09/18/13 12:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnn2501 (Post 6744696)
...Also: Where is 'open carry' legal in the U.S.?

Wyoming and Montana at least. No permit needed either.

WWW

AngieM2 09/18/13 12:30 PM

Alabama and I've seen in it in West Virginia

simi-steading 09/18/13 12:33 PM

I find it interesting that in WV it's not real common to see someone open carry.. yet they all love their guns there and are one of the most open lawed gun states...

bowdonkey 09/18/13 03:06 PM

Some of the Starbucks customers sound like some of the HT members who don't want to see the politics forum.

simi-steading 09/18/13 03:20 PM

LOL... Myself, I like seeing people carry.. It sure sends out a message to the thugs..

Paumon 09/18/13 04:08 PM

Quote:


I am writing today with a respectful request that customers no longer bring firearms into our stores or outdoor seating areas.
---
For those who champion “open carry,” please respect that Starbucks stores are places where everyone should feel relaxed and comfortable. The presence of a weapon in our stores is unsettling and upsetting for many of our customers.
The way they've worded that, reading between the lines - I think it's their way of saying "if you feel you need to display a firearm within our business place then you're not a relaxed and comfortable person and you're not welcome here."

So it's not only the firearms they don't want in their coffee shops, it's also the discomfiting people who feel the need to display firearms that they don't want in their coffee shops.

Starbucks is such a huge business they won't miss the minority of customers who refuse to patronize them because of the new rule and Starbucks will have achieved it's purpose, which is to get rid of both the discomfiting customers and their firearms. In all likelihood their 'no guns' rule will attract many more new customers than what they would lose.

copperkid3 09/18/13 04:27 PM

In all likelihood . . .
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paumon (Post 6745141)
The way they've worded that, reading between the lines - I think it's their way of saying "if you feel you need to display a firearm within our business place then you're not a relaxed and comfortable person and you're not welcome here."

So it's not only the firearms they don't want in their coffee shops, it's also the discomfiting people who feel the need to display firearms that they don't want in their coffee shops.

Starbucks is such a huge business they won't miss the minority of customers who refuse to patronize them because of the new rule and Starbucks will have achieved it's purpose, which is to get rid of both the discomfiting customers and their firearms. In all likelihood their 'no guns' rule will attract many more new customers than what they would lose.

+ + + + + + + + + +
they will now have to raise their prices to offset those lawsuits that

are sure to come, when there is another massacre in one of their

gun-free coffee shops and some smart legal beagle figures out that

"if" their client's had been able to carry and defend themselves or

others . . . they wouldn't be having this costly litigation! :hammer:

Put me on that jury . . .

CraterCove 09/18/13 04:29 PM

Funny, I'm most relaxed and comfortable out in public when I am carrying. ~shrug~

plowjockey 09/18/13 04:30 PM

Seem his point is pretty moot anyway.

I never see anyone "open carry" a weapon anywhere, unless in some LE or Military uniform. Barely even see it at gun shows or visiting sporting good stores

It's "politically incorrect" and will likely draw scrutiny, so most likely opt for a CCW and call it good.

unregistered353870 09/18/13 05:10 PM

Starbucks used to be well known as a place friendly to gun carriers, which I always thought was strange because it seems like a place liberals like to hang out. They're just responding to the majority of their customers.

Wayne02 09/18/13 07:06 PM

FYI, memo

http://dogpupkus.com/pafoa/sbux.jpeg

arabian knight 09/18/13 07:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by plowjockey (Post 6745166)
Seem his point is pretty moot anyway.

I never see anyone "open carry" a weapon anywhere, unless in some LE or Military uniform. Barely even see it at gun shows or visiting sporting good stores

It's "politically incorrect" and will likely draw scrutiny, so most likely opt for a CCW and call it good.

I saw Open Carry a Lot while living in AZ. Many were "packing". Took me a little time to get used to it but that is the way it was, and still is.
When I moved to AZ, before all this so call "waiting period" came about, you could go into a grocery store, buy a loaf of bread, gallon of milk, pound of hamburger. Stop at another counter and Buy a pistol and holster strap it on and continue shopping.

copperkid3 09/18/13 07:18 PM

Trying to walk that slippery slope along the edge of the razor.

Before this ends . . . someone's going to get cut and it won't be pretty.

CraterCove 09/18/13 07:47 PM

That memo actually seems pretty dern reasonable to me.

Paumon 09/18/13 08:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by copperkid3 (Post 6745164)
+ + + + + + + + + +
they will now have to raise their prices to offset those lawsuits that

are sure to come, when there is another massacure in one of their

gun-free coffee shops and some smart legal beagle figures out that

"if" their client's had been able to carry and defend themselves or

others . . . they wouldn't be having this costly litigation! :hammer:

Put me on that jury . . .

If law suits were going to happen wouldn't it have already happened after all the massacres that have already occurred recently in gun free zones?

Quote:

Originally Posted by copperkid3 (Post 6745378)
Trying to walk that slippery slope along the edge of the razor.

Before this ends . . . someone's going to get cut and it won't be pretty.

I think you make a good point and I agree somebody's going to get cut but I don't think it's going to end with Starbucks and I don't think it's gun free businesses that are going to get cut.

I think places like Starbucks is just the beginning. Now that a big company like that is taking a stand, the next time there's a massacre there will probably be other big companies following in the footsteps of Starbucks and other companies like them setting precedents for the "no guns" rule. With each mass slaying incident that happens, more and more big businesses will be standing up and saying "No more guns allowed on our premises."

If there's a lot of resistance from those that insist on carrying firearms into business and public premises then eventually those "no gun" businesses will start enforcing the rules rather than relying on people to be on their honour and comply out of respect. Then businesses all over the country will go with the no tolerance approach and start putting up scanners at their entrances that detect firearms and set off alarms.

Suddenly there will be a huge demand for firearms scanners and the scanner manufacturing industry will become a booming business.

See, people might feel they have the constitutional right to bear arms but there's nothing in the constitution that says businesses are forced to do business with firearms carriers or allow them on the premises.

Who will get cut? All the people who carry guns into public places, criminals and non-criminals alike. I think it's going to be inevitable until such time as the wheat (mentally stable law abiding people) has been separated from the chaff (criminals and mentally unstable people).

Paumon 09/18/13 08:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CraterCove (Post 6745428)
That memo actually seems pretty dern reasonable to me.

More than reasonable.

CraterCove 09/18/13 08:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paumon (Post 6745489)
More than reasonable.

More than reasonable? What on earth would that be? :-P

But no I'd not say more than reasonable... I'd say that they don't want to be caught in the middle of a cultural battle. It's bad for business and they are making clear that they are here to do business. I'm not offended because they are advised specifically not to confront anyone and to just try and keep out of it-- they don't want their business politicized it makes them uncomfortable and I understand.

ETA: Of course businesses have the right to refuse service to anyone they want to for whatever reasons they want--- but notice that I don't see anyone sane trying to shut down Starbucks because of this but they will rip you a new one when the old one worked just fine should you say you'd rather not bake a cake for two chicks getting married. Gods forbid you express your right not to do business with someone in that direction.

Paumon 09/18/13 08:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CraterCove (Post 6745502)
More than reasonable? What on earth would that be? :-P

But no I'd not say more than reasonable... I'd say that they don't want to be caught in the middle of a cultural battle. It's bad for business and they are making clear that they are here to do business. I'm not offended because they are advised specifically not to confront anyone and to just try and keep out of it-- they don't want their business politicized it makes them uncomfortable and I understand.

I understand too. I think they would not have taken such a stand except for what happened when they had their Starbucks Appreciation Days. All those firearms carriers that showed up for Appreciation day and posted pictures of themselves all over social media with a gun in one hand and a Starbucks coffee in the other hand was not the better part of discretion. I'm sure it most definitely was not what Starbucks had in mind nor even realized might happen when they had their Appreciation Days.

Quote:

Originally Posted by CraterCove (Post 6745502)
ETA: Of course businesses have the right to refuse service to anyone they want to for whatever reasons they want--- but notice that I don't see anyone sane trying to shut down Starbucks because of this but they will rip you a new one when the old one worked just fine should you say you'd rather not bake a cake for two chicks getting married. Gods forbid you express your right not to do business with someone in that direction.

Not relevant, so no comment.

Awnry Abe 09/18/13 08:47 PM

I already find the price of their ordinary, average coffee to be unsettling enough. Guns 'n Memos are not enough to make me care to return or stay away.

CraterCove 09/18/13 08:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paumon (Post 6745529)



Not relevant, so no comment.


Except as you pointed out: "See, people might feel they have the constitutional right to bear arms but there's nothing in the constitution that says businesses are forced to do business with firearms carriers or allow them on the premises."

Just pointing out that people on one side of the fence go for blood when you try and say you can't be forced to do business with certain people for any reason.

Shrek 09/18/13 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by mnn2501 (Post 6744696)
Starbucks CEO writes:


Not sure how many here visit Starbucks, I very seldom do however this loses any of my future business.
Also: Where is 'open carry' legal in the U.S.?

Open Carry is now clearly defined as legal in all 50 states although some states and local municipalities regulate firearms to stronger levels of regulation.

simi-steading 09/18/13 09:17 PM

You can't open carry in MD.. unless you get one of their non existent permits...

It is a crime to wear or carry openly any rifle or shotgun with the intent or purpose of unlawfully injuring any person.

It is unlawful for any person without a permit to wear or carry a handgun, openly or concealed, upon or about his person, or to knowingly transport a handgun in any vehicle traveling on public roads, highways, waterways or airways or upon roads or parking lots generally used by the public. This does not apply to any person wearing, carrying or transporting a handgun within the confines of real estate owned or leased by him, or on which he resided, or within the confines of a business establishment owned or leased by him. [3]


http://www.usacarry.com/maryland_con...formation.html

Don't let that intent part of the first line fool you.. You can't carry period.. you will be arrested..

Maryland also does not honor any other state's concealed permit..

I've looked into their laws hard since I transport guns through the state to our farm. I've also got a very good friend there that has a C&R license so he's real up on the laws and I get the newest changes fro him when ever laws change.. He's spent many hours and days testifying at the state capital and speaking at rallies in the state for change..

copperkid3 09/18/13 09:17 PM

You're living in a fool's paradise . . . (otherwise known as
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paumon (Post 6745487)
If law suits were going to happen wouldn't it have already happened after all the massacres that have already occurred recently in gun free zones?



I think you make a good point and I agree somebody's going to get cut but I don't think it's going to end with Starbucks and I don't think it's gun free businesses that are going to get cut.

I think places like Starbucks is just the beginning. Now that a big company like that is taking a stand, the next time there's a massacre there will probably be other big companies following in the footsteps of Starbucks and other companies like them setting precedents for the "no guns" rule. With each mass slaying incident that happens, more and more big businesses will be standing up and saying "No more guns allowed on our premises."


If there's a lot of resistance from those that insist on carrying firearms into business and public premises then eventually those "no gun" businesses will start enforcing the rules rather than relying on people to be on their honour and comply out of respect. Then businesses all over the country will go with the no tolerance approach and start putting up scanners at their entrances that detect firearms and set off alarms.

Suddenly there will be a huge demand for firearms scanners and the scanner manufacturing industry will become a booming business.

See, people might feel they have the constitutional right to bear arms but there's nothing in the constitution that says businesses are forced to do business with firearms carriers or allow them on the premises.

Who will get cut? All the people who carry guns into public places, criminals and non-criminals alike. I think it's going to be inevitable until such time as the wheat (mentally stable law abiding people) has been separated from the chaff (criminals and mentally unstable people).

+ + + + + + + + + + + + +
Canada.) And that dog won't hunt on this side of the border.

There are far and away more gun owners (and those who value

and respect our 2nd amendment rights,) than those who don't.

Your wished for scenerio, while touching in it's naivety, lacks a certain something.

Let's ponder that a moment and reconsider what you've just proposed. . . .

oh yeah, it will NEVER happen! Even if you managed to get a majority of

businesses to go along with it, the only time those sensors and alarms might

be going off, is if some 'criminal' or nar'do well, violated that company's policy

and carried onto the premises. If such happened, it would only be because

he (or they) are planning to use them in that "gun-free" zone. And likely as not,

they will succeed in their plans, as the law-abiding former gun carriers will no

longer be patronizing those establishments . . . having boycotted them when

said companies implemented their myoptic and short-sighted policy.

Of course it is their right to make whatever foolish decision that their stockholders

will allow, but in the end, the bottom line is usually all that matters. If it is in

the red (whether from a bloodbath of progressives or simply declining sales

from former patrons, now boycotting and/or employees and current customers

who now, are no longer safe) makes little difference to investors,

who are loosing money. So dream on . . .because it will likely

become a nightmare for some.

Danaus29 09/18/13 09:20 PM

Open carry is legal in Ohio but if you carry inside several city limits you will get to know the local cops quite well.

When dh and I were in Alaska we saw several people carrying firearms. It didn't worry me in the city but when we were out hiking it freaked me out a little. Supposedly the bears are that bad.

copperkid3 09/18/13 10:11 PM

Not necessarily . . . . some things take time before someone
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Paumon (Post 6745487)
If law suits were going to happen wouldn't it have already happened after all the massacres that have already occurred recently in gun free zones?

+ + + + +
else (like a lawyer),

recognizes both a cause & effect,

as well as opportunity knocking.

Interesting how you described these "killing zones" . . .

excuse me, the politically correct term is gun-free zones, as a

MASSACRE. What exactly, is your definition of a massacre?

And who exactly, is responsible for it? Only the shooter(s)?

How about those who put in place those restrictions, that enable

those who wish to do harm to as many others as possible with little

danger to themselves? Are the victims also not to blame for allowing

others to decide their fates? Should not they be allowed to at least

decide whether they wish to protect their own lives or depend on the

nanny state to do so? It would appear that those so-called 'regressives'

who know what is best for the sheeple, should at least be held as accountable

as those who have pulled the trigger. Because BOTH have blood on their hands!

beowoulf90 09/19/13 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wy_white_wolf (Post 6744821)
Wyoming and Montana at least. No permit needed either.

WWW

Might I add Pennsylvania! No License to Carry Firearm needed except in a City of the 1st Class (Philadelphia).

unregistered358967 09/19/13 10:04 AM

I wonder why the flip-flop? A few weeks ago we purposely went into our local SB because there was some mom group saying they were going to boycott.. http://www.usatoday.com/story/money/...group/2681203/

A man came in with a gun and lots of ammo..looked like Rambo totally out of place in MN suburbia, but honestly it didn't bother me one bit...

MO_cows 09/19/13 10:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paumon (Post 6745141)
The way they've worded that, reading between the lines - I think it's their way of saying "if you feel you need to display a firearm within our business place then you're not a relaxed and comfortable person and you're not welcome here."

So it's not only the firearms they don't want in their coffee shops, it's also the discomfiting people who feel the need to display firearms that they don't want in their coffee shops.

Starbucks is such a huge business they won't miss the minority of customers who refuse to patronize them because of the new rule and Starbucks will have achieved it's purpose, which is to get rid of both the discomfiting customers and their firearms. In all likelihood their 'no guns' rule will attract many more new customers than what they would lose.

I think a lot of people who exercise their open carry rights or who have concealed carry permits are probably not the type of people to visit Starbucks to wait in line to pay 6 bucks for a cup of froo-froo coffee in the first place. I think it's a stupid, political pandering type of move. The CEO was on national tv saying they wouldn't actually ask anyone to leave or try to make this an official policy and enforce it, they are just asking pretty please don't bring guns into Starbucks. Dumb as a box of rocks.

Hollowdweller 09/19/13 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by simi-steading (Post 6744829)
I find it interesting that in WV it's not real common to see someone open carry.. yet they all love their guns there and are one of the most open lawed gun states...

WV has a low crime rate. Not that much need to carry a gun.

I have seen a lot of people carry them in the Monongahela National Forest wilderness though.

Hollowdweller 09/19/13 10:16 AM

By the way this morning on the news the Starbucks guys said it was not because they hated guns but because there had been a lot of conflict between gun owners and anti gunners in the stores.

edcopp 09/19/13 07:07 PM

In my town (in OHIO) I can get any size coffee:coffee: that I want for $1 at McDonalds. They do not care what I carry open or concealed or both.

I became aware of Starbucks pricing policy for coffee:coffee:, before I ever thought about paying them a visit. I can't do that here anyway the per capita income in my county will not support a Starbucks. It would be necessary for me to drive to the next county to even get to a Starbucks. So I have never done that. Did I miss anything?:coffee:


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:51 PM.