Coming soon.......Executive Order #666
 

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/technolo...193050045.html

To be used by law enforcement, at any 'free-speech' rallies against those in already in power,
who haven't approved the 'message' being given.....

Grrrrr. And while this is happening, the rest of us will quarrel amongst ourselves about who should or should not be silenced.

I believe that the San Diego police already have a sound gun to control crowds! I discussed this type of weapon with the LAPD back about 25-30 years ago. They weren't interested then, they probably have one now though!

This coupled with the microwave gun could cook you and you couldn't even yell about it.

I'm sure that when President Romney signs this order, you'll be explaining to us why it's the patriotic thing to do, too.

"If you're an OWS hippie, then you should be blasted with this thing (and then be arrested) - you stinking loser. But if you are praying to Jesus in front of the Capitol, or picketing an abortion clinic, they better not infringe on your rights!!"

AMAZING!!! How you'all are able to lump us all together
 

*****************************************
and deny us our right to free speech *(no doubt because we don't see eye-to-eye on ideology),
but I've NEVER said anything against the opposing sides right to that same amendment.....in fact I've ALWAYS defended it.

Which I think is the greatest difference that I see between us.....your rights trump mine. Hypocrisy???
You tell me.....since you do have the right to respond and no one can figure out a way to make that thing work over the internet...yet!

My greatest fear.....(if I had to 'claim' I had one), would be
that this 'weapon' would be mis-used and/or abused,
no matter which side gained (or held) power.

You will have to tell people when you are being sarcastic.
Some have no idea and think you are serious.

Well yes, of course the First Amendment doesn't apply to progressives. It only applies to conservatives.

Unless Obama is reelected, then everybody better shut up or be permanently silenced by his goons.
He's mob, don't forget that.

I haven't tried to supress you in any way whatsoever... just pointing out that this hypothetical order, given the precedent of ALL recent presidents would be just as likely to be signed by a Republican president as a Democrat. Campaign rhetoric aside, neither party has a good record for looking out for individual American freedoms.

Goons and MOB! :smack

Go Corny. Those same old tired lines are just getting more and more played out.

Goons.

Mob. Goons. Mob. Thugs! Thugs!

:rotfl:

Ha! I don't know if Copperkid was upset at my post or not, but yeah I was being sarcastic! :) Just summarizing my observations since coming here on this board.

That is where you would be wrong!

Those like myself fought against Bush and the Reps on the UNpatriot Act, the bail-outs by both Bush and Obama... We fought against Obama and the Dems and Reps on the NDAA...


If it is unconstitutional, it is unconstitutional, no matter who is president, we will fight against it, unlike those who follow Obama.

It can be infective if you wear ear phones that block loud noises. So there is a way against it.

we're on the same side then...

That is one cool way to shut the folks up that have nothing to say but disrupt any given speaker. Cool. People ALSO have the RIGHT to HEAR what a speaker has to say without being out shouted by some idiot out there, whose THOINK his rights have more constitutional right then those that come to HEAR what some speaker is saying.

If a person has a stage, microphone, and speakers and still gets shouted down something is wrong.

AK - Is that what you really thoink? That people actually go to speeches for the the sole purpose of disrupting the speaker for no good reason but to do that? Just for funsies? They've got nothing to say - nothing?? You are the judge of that, eh? In any case, if that were to ever happen, I'm sure there's already rules on the books to manage that scenario without using sound guns.

While I'm against this, I think AK was referring to those of OWS who went to a conservative speech/conference just to shout them down and disrupt them..

Why?

Because OWS thinks they have more Rights than anyone else, thus they have no problem forcing their opinion on others or to disrupt others and use violence on those who don't submit.....

For example if you and your friends, say more then 20 of you were surrounding a person or persons chanting some mantra, what would your reaction be if you were one of the people being surrounded?

I know what OWS's choice was, they claimed they were being unjustly abused by police, when they (OWS) surrounded the police and police pepper sprayed them so they could exit the area safely...But of course OWS blamed the police for their actions.. IF told to "make a hole" and you don't obey and they (the police) feel threatened or surrounded expect uncomfortable actions t take place...

Sometimes I wonder if OWS is a false flag just to make more laws that control and restrict all of us. Sure seems like a lot of people are willing to step further into a police state if it means those pesky OWS kids will be silenced.

Isn't that what happened to that speaker at a university? The muslim students shouted him down! Weren't they found guilty of violating his freedom of speach?

Agreed......and this 'tool' has the potential for more evil
 

****************************************
than good coming out of it's use/mis-use.

sapphrye.....you're a relative 'newbie' and it's going to take some time to figure out when you are
serious ......or not. Thanks for explaining it this time.

Darn, where was this thing when my mother-in-law was alive?