An interesting article about Monosanto. - Page 2 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > Specialty Forums > General Chat

General Chat Sponsored by LPC Survival


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 12/22/11, 04:27 PM
Danaus29's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 19,335
Ooooh NickieL, you stepped in it! You forgot that some people will defend Monsanto with their dying breath. And that it doesn't matter how many reputable sources you post info from it's all just smoke and mirrors and bad press toward a company only because it is successful. Never mind the fact that rBGH is rarely used now because it harmed the cows or that there are now some superweeds or the fact that new herbicides which don't break down are killing gardens and trees.
But on behalf of those who want this information; thank you for the link.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12/22/11, 05:04 PM
NickieL's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Station
Posts: 14,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by Danaus29 View Post
Ooooh NickieL, you stepped in it! You forgot that some people will defend Monsanto with their dying breath. And that it doesn't matter how many reputable sources you post info from it's all just smoke and mirrors and bad press toward a company only because it is successful. Never mind the fact that rBGH is rarely used now because it harmed the cows or that there are now some superweeds or the fact that new herbicides which don't break down are killing gardens and trees.
But on behalf of those who want this information; thank you for the link.
\

they can defend it all they want. They are still wrong though lol
__________________
It's not that I don't like mankind, I just like nature a whole lot more.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12/22/11, 05:04 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 12,448
There isn't any crops we raise today that hasn't been changed by man.
If crops were left the same as when we first started cultivating them there would be a lot fewer people in the U.S. Many of them would have starved to death.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12/22/11, 05:45 PM
NickieL's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Station
Posts: 14,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by pancho View Post
There isn't any crops we raise today that hasn't been changed by man.
If crops were left the same as when we first started cultivating them there would be a lot fewer people in the U.S. Many of them would have starved to death.
yes, and I have NO problem with that. I have a problem with un-naturally splicing poisons into crops, then blocking any labeling of those crops so people don't know, and pattening those crops so nobody can save their own seeds anymore, then forcing other countries to buy those potentially harmful crops.
__________________
It's not that I don't like mankind, I just like nature a whole lot more.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12/22/11, 05:58 PM
arabian knight's Avatar
Miniature Horse lover
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by pancho View Post
There isn't any crops we raise today that hasn't been changed by man.
If crops were left the same as when we first started cultivating them there would be a lot fewer people in the U.S. Many of them would have starved to death.
Very true. And there are more companies doing the same thing other then this Monsanto that everyone seems to sentence every time a subject tike this comes. up. There are others just as big into genetics and chemicals just as much as Monsanto is. Monsanto is not the bad guy.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12/22/11, 06:13 PM
HillRunner's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: North Central WV
Posts: 447
Quote:
Originally Posted by texican View Post
I can't wait till we get rid of Monsanto and all commercial farming once and for all.... along with about 6 billion folks that depend upon them. The world will have time to heal, global warming will no longer be a concern, and anyone surviving will be able to do whatever they please!
I third this!
__________________
“As the farmer who won the lottery said when asked what he was going to do with his winnings "Keep farming until it's all gone”
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12/22/11, 06:14 PM
arabian knight's Avatar
Miniature Horse lover
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,242
Nice of all the people that want 6 Billion to Die~! Nice Christians at Christmas time..
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12/22/11, 06:23 PM
Danaus29's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 19,335
I want the billions of people who have contracted cancer or other poison related illnesses to not be sick or have to die from it. 6 of one, half dozen of the other. Maybe if there was less food to waste people wouldn't be so wasteful.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12/22/11, 06:28 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Manitowoc Wi
Posts: 739
Quote:
Originally Posted by arabian knight View Post
Nice of all the people that want 6 Billion to Die~! Nice Christians at Christmas time..
I am very happy you have come out with strong support of Monsanto. It doesn't surprise me. Just for the record, I think it fair that people take a close look at just what this corporation and you, arabian knight, represents:



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monsanto


Believe it, if there was such a movement to kill 6 billion people, Monsanto would quickly move to make the product and make a profit from it.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12/22/11, 07:15 PM
The cream separator guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Southern MO
Posts: 3,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by haypoint View Post
You are wrongly assuming that everyone will simply lay down and die. I doubt that. More and more ground would be turned up and planted to crops, even environmentally fragil areas. Much more fuel would be needed to cultivate without weed killers. More erosion and loss of top soil due to cultivation. Irrigation would be a way to increase yeilds, exhausting our water table.Sensitive grasslands would be needed to grow corn and soybeans. Highly erodable lands would be needed as crop land.

The earth has been through a few Global Warming and just aas many Ice Ages. All without our weak efforts. One Mt St. Helen threw up more gasses and soot than every tail pipe for the past 100 years.

You depend on Monsanto and the modern agriculture that goes with it. Because when it fails, a few of those 6 billion people are gonna come and gobble you up, Mmmmmm..... Texan....
Yes but the net effect of a volcano has a cooling effect; why are we still warming hmm? Is your flawed beliefs of GW also corresponding to your love of these satanic seeds of which no one actually knows if they're safe or not? Al studies are done by the biotech industry. This is a blatant conflict of interest and a blind man could see it.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 12/22/11, 07:29 PM
SquashNut's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 11,431
Quote:
Originally Posted by arabian knight View Post
Very true. And there are more companies doing the same thing other then this Monsanto that everyone seems to sentence every time a subject tike this comes. up. There are others just as big into genetics and chemicals just as much as Monsanto is. Monsanto is not the bad guy.
so if you and your brother jump off a cliff, does it make it alright because you both did it?
__________________
squashnut & bassketcher

Champagne D Argent, White New Zealand & Californian Cross Rabbits
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12/22/11, 07:34 PM
Bearfootfarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 34,165
Quote:
Is your flawed beliefs of GW also corresponding to your love of these satanic seeds of which no one actually knows if they're safe or not?
Could you translate that into English please?

Quote:
Al studies are done by the biotech industry
Then all the negative reports must be made up lies if there have been no independent studies?
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12/22/11, 07:42 PM
MO_cows's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: W Mo
Posts: 9,268
Satanic seeds? Into melodrama, eh?

Monsanto is a 900 pound gorilla of a company, and sure some of their actions come off as bullying, but they are not at the center of some conspiracy to destroy the world.

The development of genetically engineered crops have allowed more food to be produced with less fuel, chemicals, etc. Personally, I am a little uneasy about tinkering with the building blocks of life, too, but you can't deny the benefits to humanity that these products have delivered. And if there was harm that could be conclusively proved to be caused by consuming these products, there would be a looooooong line of lawyers with lawsuit filings in hand to get at some of their money. Has that happened? No.

So if you don't want to use their products, don't. There are alternatives. But don't kid yourself that by bad-mouthing them you are on some crusade to better the world, either.
__________________
It is still best to be honest and truthful; to make the most of what we have; to be happy with the simple pleasures and to be cheerful and have courage when things go wrong.
Laura Ingalls Wilder
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12/22/11, 07:58 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 12,664
I'ts an interesting article, all right, but it's only one side of the story, which happens to be told by a company hawking heirloom seeds.

Here is the other side. I'm pretty simple minded, so I had to read the cable several times, but still had a tough time seeing exactly, where is was a conspiracy.

I'm sure though that those who want to see a conspiracy, will surely see one.

http://wikileaks.org/cable/2007/02/07PARIS515.html#
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12/22/11, 08:09 PM
NickieL's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Station
Posts: 14,761
Quote:
Originally Posted by MO_cows View Post
Satanic seeds? Into melodrama, eh?

Monsanto is a 900 pound gorilla of a company, and sure some of their actions come off as bullying, but they are not at the center of some conspiracy to destroy the world.

The development of genetically engineered crops have allowed more food to be produced with less fuel, chemicals, etc. Personally, I am a little uneasy about tinkering with the building blocks of life, too, but you can't deny the benefits to humanity that these products have delivered. And if there was harm that could be conclusively proved to be caused by consuming these products, there would be a looooooong line of lawyers with lawsuit filings in hand to get at some of their money. Has that happened? No.

So if you don't want to use their products, don't. There are alternatives. But don't kid yourself that by bad-mouthing them you are on some crusade to better the world, either.
I'd love to NOT use the products....except they don't label them!!!!
__________________
It's not that I don't like mankind, I just like nature a whole lot more.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12/22/11, 08:41 PM
MO_cows's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: W Mo
Posts: 9,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by NickieL View Post
I'd love to NOT use the products....except they don't label them!!!!
Sure they do - doesn't it say Monsanto on every sack of seeds??

I suspect you mean labeling at the retail level, telling you if there are any GM ingredients in a product. How can Monsanto be responsible for that? If they sold the seeds, they are supposed to also be responsible for tracking and labeling the crop that was grown with them?? The folks who buy, sell and ship grain by the millions of tons don't want to have to keep it segregated. That's why it isn't on the label. So if you want to make sure that one kernel of GM corn never passes your lips, you will likely have to buy direct from a producer or buy some of the organic and other specialty products who state on their packaging that they use heirloom varieties.
__________________
It is still best to be honest and truthful; to make the most of what we have; to be happy with the simple pleasures and to be cheerful and have courage when things go wrong.
Laura Ingalls Wilder
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12/22/11, 10:07 PM
The cream separator guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Southern MO
Posts: 3,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by MO_cows View Post
Sure they do - doesn't it say Monsanto on every sack of seeds??

I suspect you mean labeling at the retail level, telling you if there are any GM ingredients in a product. How can Monsanto be responsible for that? If they sold the seeds, they are supposed to also be responsible for tracking and labeling the crop that was grown with them?? The folks who buy, sell and ship grain by the millions of tons don't want to have to keep it segregated. That's why it isn't on the label. So if you want to make sure that one kernel of GM corn never passes your lips, you will likely have to buy direct from a producer or buy some of the organic and other specialty products who state on their packaging that they use heirloom varieties.
And that's just the problem. People don't even know that they're not eating real sugar, or that an enormous amount of antibiotics and hormones are in their milk, and that all their food contains GM ingredients. Thus, it ultimately is a veil pulled over the general public's eyes, and is therefore immoral, deceptive, and vile. Since attempts to label GM products are usurped, the only answer is that politicians do not want to go against agribusiness's wants, and thus is a conflict of interest. Keep on using the veil, though, looks great on you,
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12/22/11, 10:30 PM
Danaus29's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ohio
Posts: 19,335
Monsanto has made huge contributions to politicians who have been instrumental in keeping GMO and rGBH info off food labels. When companies did put that info on their products Monsanto (along with other companies) jumped into an anti-information lawsuit.

No, I'm not going to waste my time posting links or looking it up to post links. Those who want to know the info can google "monsanto label gmo products lawsuit" and come up with tons of dirt and fines levied against Monsanto and a few other companies. Those who support Monsanto will dispute the facts behind each link.
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12/22/11, 11:23 PM
MO_cows's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: W Mo
Posts: 9,268
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heritagefarm View Post
And that's just the problem. People don't even know that they're not eating real sugar, or that an enormous amount of antibiotics and hormones are in their milk, and that all their food contains GM ingredients. Thus, it ultimately is a veil pulled over the general public's eyes, and is therefore immoral, deceptive, and vile. Since attempts to label GM products are usurped, the only answer is that politicians do not want to go against agribusiness's wants, and thus is a conflict of interest. Keep on using the veil, though, looks great on you,
Enormous amounts of antibiotics and hormones in milk? You sure must have a low opinion of dairy farmers. I think they are some of the hardest working and most devoted folks in the ag world! I believe that anyone who cares enough to live and breathe milking cows 3 times a day is gonna care enough to follow the withdrawal time limits if they have to give antibiotics. As to hormones, I assume you mean BST and there is milk in the case that is BST-free if that is what you want. The milk I buy for my own family is from a local dairy that doesn't use BST and bottles their own milk on the farm. It comes in glass jugs and it is twice the price of the commodity milk. But I like it better so I buy it. But I have also drunk plenty of commodity milk in my life and suffered no ill effects. Everyone can make their own choices. But we don't have to get all hysterical about the products we don't care to use. When I choose an organic or non-conventional food product, I do it because I believe it is better. Not because I am scared of the other products or have some irrational grudge against them.
__________________
It is still best to be honest and truthful; to make the most of what we have; to be happy with the simple pleasures and to be cheerful and have courage when things go wrong.
Laura Ingalls Wilder
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12/22/11, 11:38 PM
SquashNut's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 11,431
I wonder if the GMO's have been used long enough to know what they can do to a person or what it won't do. people have a right to at least wait till they really know, instead of finding after the fact. Same with pharmicuticals..
__________________
squashnut & bassketcher

Champagne D Argent, White New Zealand & Californian Cross Rabbits
Reply With Quote
Reply



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:52 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture