Arctic not completely dark in winters anymore - Page 3 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > Specialty Forums > General Chat

General Chat Sponsored by LPC Survival


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 12/28/10, 02:15 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by beowoulf90 View Post
You are correct!

I believe NL is wasting her time.. Man made global warming is a fallacy and a myth. In 1922 they blamed cattle ranchers for global warming, yet we are still here.
I'd never heard that before, so had to go look it up.

Fascinating! The same, identical headlines almost 100 years ago.....seals and icebergs.

Yet, we and they (seals and icebergs) are still here.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 12/28/10, 03:13 PM
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 2,053
I believe we are experiencing some climate change just by how much windier it is where I live than it ever used to be.

As far as the statist man made global warming scare, like everything else, it's about money and control.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 12/28/10, 06:15 PM
arabian knight's Avatar
Miniature Horse lover
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by Win07_351 View Post
I believe we are experiencing some climate change just by how much windier it is where I live than it ever used to be.

As far as the statist man made global warming scare, like everything else, it's about money and control.
Yes it is about control and nothing more. The earth is way more dynamic than some believe. And Earth Sun and Moon have way more control over the earth then what man can do.
Gee and besides we are coming out of The Little Ice Age. Hmmmm how does that happen? It warms up and will continue to do so until the next swing back into an cooling trend again. After all there has been several ice ages, over the earth long history, and by golly it has to warm up to get it back to being warm again.
__________________
Oh my, dishes yet to wash and dry

See My Pictures at
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/0903/arabianknight/
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 12/28/10, 07:13 PM
wyld thang's Avatar
God Smacked Jesus Freak
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Turtle Island/Yelm, WA "Land of the Dancing Spirits"--Salish
Posts: 7,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg273 View Post
The fossil fuels we are burning represent hundreds of millions of years of concentrated energy. And we are releasing all that energy back into the atmosphere in a few short generations. Anyone with any sense should know this will affect the enviornment. Lets not make this a 'leftie vs. rightie' thing. We are not being good stewards of the land.
and what happens when a volcano burps up a gajillion megatons of "energy" and "stuff" into the atmosphere?
__________________
THE BEGINNING IS NEAR
5-star double-rated astronavagatrix earth girl
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 12/28/10, 07:48 PM
naturelover's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 7,802
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyld thang View Post
and what happens when a volcano burps up a gajillion megatons of "energy" and "stuff" into the atmosphere?
Climate change.

.
Reply With Quote
  #46  
Old 12/28/10, 09:39 PM
wyld thang's Avatar
God Smacked Jesus Freak
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Turtle Island/Yelm, WA "Land of the Dancing Spirits"--Salish
Posts: 7,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by naturelover View Post
Climate change.

.
yes, it's a blip for a few years, and it makes things colder and one volcano spouts a LOT of stuff more than man does

I'll say it again, (man made)global climate change is only a shell game to cloak the real problems that will git us quicker, and the control thing too.

http://reason.com/archives/2010/04/27/peak-everything
Peak Everything? Forget peak oil. What about peak lithium, peak neodymium, and peak phosphorus?
(I snipped stuff)

“Is it realistic to predict that knowledge accumulation is so powerful as to outweigh the physical limits of physical capital services and the limited substitution possibilities for natural resources?” In other words, can increasing scientific knowledge and technological innovation overcome any limitations to economic growth posed by the depletion of non-renewable resources?

In 2007, William Tahil, an analyst with the France-based consultancy, Meridian International Research, issued a report that alarmingly concluded that there is “insufficient economically recoverable lithium available in the Earth's crust to sustain electric vehicle manufacture in the volumes required.” Tahil added, “Depletion rates would exceed current oil depletion rates and switch dependency from one diminishing resource to another.” (then read more for lithium alternatives, the Chevy Volt has a 400 pound lithium battery array...)

Neodymium is a rare earth metal used extensively to produce permanent magnets found in everything from computer magnetic disks and cell phones to wind turbines and automobiles. For example, the magnets that drive a Prius hybrid’s electric motor use more than two pounds of neodymium. Interestingly, neodymium magnets were invented in the 1980s to overcome the global cobalt supply shock that occurred as the result of internal warfare in Zaire. Because China can more cheaply produce neodymium than any other country in the world, that country is now the source of 95 percent of the world’s neodymium. Recently, however, China’s government warned that it would begin restricting exports of neodymium (and other rare earth metals) in order to insure supplies for its own manufacturers.

The Global Phosphorus Research Initiative (GPRI) notes that modern agriculture is dependent on continual inputs of phosphorus fertilizer and that known reserves could be depleted within the next 50 to 100 years. The current issue of Foreign Policy ominously warns that failing to meet the challenge of “peak phosphorus” would mean that “humanity faces a Malthusian trap of widespread famine on a scale that we have not yet experienced.” But unlike petroleum or natural gas, phosphorus, as an element, is not destroyed when it’s used and so could be recovered and recycled.

***********
just sayin, often the marketed green alternative is just robbing Peter to pay Paul.
__________________
THE BEGINNING IS NEAR
5-star double-rated astronavagatrix earth girl
Reply With Quote
  #47  
Old 12/28/10, 09:54 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: southern illinois
Posts: 6,713
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyld thang View Post
and what happens when a volcano burps up a gajillion megatons of "energy" and "stuff" into the atmosphere?
GLAD YOU ASKED! Maybe this link will help educate you. Human activity produces A HUNDRED TIMES the greenhouse gas emissions of the earths volcanic activity on a YEARLY basis.

http://environment.about.com/od/gree...olcano-gas.htm

From the link...

According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the world’s volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide. Despite the arguments to the contrary, the facts speak for themselves: Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors.

Last edited by greg273; 12/28/10 at 10:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #48  
Old 12/28/10, 10:02 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: southern illinois
Posts: 6,713
Again, people are dismissing science because they dont like the politics of the situation. I am NO FAN of any sort of carbon tax shell games. As it stands, the carbon credit scam IS a tool to control people. Unfortunate, because no one really knows what adding so much greenhouse gas to the atmosphere is going to do. Maybe nothing, maybe Miami underwater in 50 years. Climate records show a DIRECT CORRELATION between CO2 levels and global temperature. Yes, there are natural cycles, but as humans. we ARE a force of nature, lets not try to pretend we are somehow absolved from responsibility.
Reply With Quote
  #49  
Old 12/28/10, 10:16 PM
Bearfootfarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 33,479
Quote:
Again, people are dismissing science because they dont like the politics of the situation
Much the same as you dismiss science that says it's NOT caused by man's activities.

It's cooler now than it was 5 million years ago
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #50  
Old 12/28/10, 10:19 PM
texican's Avatar  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Carthage, Texas
Posts: 12,260
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg273 View Post
GLAD YOU ASKED! Maybe this link will help educate you. Human activity produces A HUNDRED TIMES the greenhouse gas emissions of the earths volcanic activity on a YEARLY basis.

http://environment.about.com/od/gree...olcano-gas.htm

From the link...

According to the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), the world’s volcanoes, both on land and undersea, generate about 200 million tons of carbon dioxide (CO2) annually, while our automotive and industrial activities cause some 24 billion tons of CO2 emissions every year worldwide. Despite the arguments to the contrary, the facts speak for themselves: Greenhouse gas emissions from volcanoes comprise less than one percent of those generated by today’s human endeavors.
I would never ever worry about a volcano or super volcano's CO2 emissions... they'd actually probably come in handy, later on to balance the out the effects of the really deadly emission.... dust, volcanic ash, and other particulates. Last supervolcano that went off changed the planets temperature for a year... the year with no summer. Back in the 1800's. Imagine the "interesting times" we'd encounter if we went through a growing season, without a harvest!

I'll take human's CO2 emissions any day, versus a super volcanoes sun blocking layer of particulates. With AGW, it's a slow slide into warmier times, with a particulate event, it's an extinction level event.
__________________
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. Seneca
Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival. W. Edwards Deming
Reply With Quote
  #51  
Old 12/28/10, 10:22 PM
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 2,341
[QUOTE=naturelover;4826834]

The White House, stung by its failure to legislate a cap-and-trade bill before the recent congressional elections, has a Plan B set to be implemented within weeks.

The new U.S. rules -- passed by executive order -- are aimed at curbing emissions from large industrial facilities like refineries and cement factories. They go into effect Jan. 2.



The EPA rules will require tougher emissions standards when air quality regulators issue permits to industry.

The first step tightens rules for existing facilities planning any expansion that would increase emissions. Then, starting in July, the rules will be extended to include newly constructed facilities........." continued.


All the GW nonsense aside, I can't find anything about this Executive Order. Can ayone else enlighten me as to where I can read it?
Reply With Quote
  #52  
Old 12/28/10, 10:45 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: southern illinois
Posts: 6,713
Quote:
Originally Posted by texican View Post
I would never ever worry about a volcano or super volcano's CO2 emissions... they'd actually probably come in handy, later on to balance the out the effects of the really deadly emission.... dust, volcanic ash, and other particulates. Last supervolcano that went off changed the planets temperature for a year... the year with no summer. Back in the 1800's. Imagine the "interesting times" we'd encounter if we went through a growing season, without a harvest!

I'll take human's CO2 emissions any day, versus a super volcanoes sun blocking layer of particulates. With AGW, it's a slow slide into warmier times, with a particulate event, it's an extinction level event.
The reality is, we're dealing with both volcanic and manmade pollution.
For my area,southern Illinois, about 550ft above sea level, I can't say what the effects of an annual temp rise of a few degrees would be. It may be a positive, maybe not. Longer growing season, at least by a few weeks? Yeah, I'd take that.
But theres a few hundred million impoverished Asian folks who'll be looking for new homes if the sea does rise by a meter or so in the next century. Our coastal cities might not fare too well either.
We'll find out, one way or another!
Reply With Quote
  #53  
Old 12/28/10, 10:58 PM
arabian knight's Avatar
Miniature Horse lover
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,116
Why are there more people try to get close to the equator verses the poles? People like to be warm. LOL
__________________
Oh my, dishes yet to wash and dry

See My Pictures at
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/0903/arabianknight/
Reply With Quote
  #54  
Old 12/28/10, 10:58 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: southern illinois
Posts: 6,713
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bearfootfarm View Post
Much the same as you dismiss science that says it's NOT caused by man's activities.

It's cooler now than it was 5 million years ago
BFF, point us to some links please? I'm not dismissing ANY info i havent at least looked at.

And cooler 5 mil years ago? Probably. Then warmer , then cooler. Yeah I've heard. 'Natural Cycles' which are still going on today. Except today, MANKIND must figure into the equasion. We ARE a force of nature. Its already shown we in our masses release 20,000,000,000 TONS of CO2 into the enviornment EVERY YEAR.
I dont have any beachfront property, so I'm not all that concerned for my immediate well being if GW does indeed occur.
Reply With Quote
  #55  
Old 12/28/10, 11:04 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: southern illinois
Posts: 6,713
Quote:
Originally Posted by arabian knight View Post
Why are there more people try to get close to the equator verses the poles? People like to be warm. LOL
Come spend a summer in southern illinois. The heat and humidity will probably send you running right back to the cool Wisconsin woods! Provided Global Warming doesnt fry the pines of course.
Reply With Quote
  #56  
Old 12/28/10, 11:07 PM
arabian knight's Avatar
Miniature Horse lover
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg273 View Post
Come spend a summer in southern illinois. The heat and humidity will probably send you running right back to the cool Wisconsin woods! Provided Global Warming doesnt fry the pines of course.
Just try to grow any kind of crops with snow on the ground. Nobody wants an ice age. But even a few degrees warmer you still can grow food.
__________________
Oh my, dishes yet to wash and dry

See My Pictures at
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/0903/arabianknight/
Reply With Quote
  #57  
Old 12/28/10, 11:32 PM
SquashNut's Avatar  
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Idaho
Posts: 11,431
sounds to me like the earths axis has tilted a bit too far.
__________________
squashnut & bassketcher

Champagne D Argent, White New Zealand & Californian Cross Rabbits
Reply With Quote
  #58  
Old 12/29/10, 12:31 AM
Bearfootfarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 33,479
Quote:
And cooler 5 mil years ago? Probably
No, it was about 7*C WARMER then, without any help from man, and it will get that hot again, no matter what we do.

Sea levels have been rising for thousands of years, and are NOT rising any faster now

Quote:
BFF, point us to some links please?
Type my statements into Google.
That will work with most of the facts I present
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #59  
Old 12/29/10, 01:17 AM
wyld thang's Avatar
God Smacked Jesus Freak
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Turtle Island/Yelm, WA "Land of the Dancing Spirits"--Salish
Posts: 7,456
Quote:
Originally Posted by texican View Post
I would never ever worry about a volcano or super volcano's CO2 emissions... they'd actually probably come in handy, later on to balance the out the effects of the really deadly emission.... dust, volcanic ash, and other particulates. Last supervolcano that went off changed the planets temperature for a year... the year with no summer. Back in the 1800's. Imagine the "interesting times" we'd encounter if we went through a growing season, without a harvest!

I'll take human's CO2 emissions any day, versus a super volcanoes sun blocking layer of particulates. With AGW, it's a slow slide into warmier times, with a particulate event, it's an extinction level event.
this.

and it's obvious .2 gigatons a year("every year") doesn't take into account catastrophic eruptions, which is what I mainly had in my head Like the 1880 one Texican mentioned(Krakatoa?) the big poofs of stuff that block the sun.
__________________
THE BEGINNING IS NEAR
5-star double-rated astronavagatrix earth girl
Reply With Quote
  #60  
Old 12/29/10, 01:37 AM
Bigkat80's Avatar
American Patriot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Vicksburg, MS
Posts: 2,333
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg273 View Post
The reality is, we're dealing with both volcanic and manmade pollution.
For my area,southern Illinois, about 550ft above sea level, I can't say what the effects of an annual temp rise of a few degrees would be. It may be a positive, maybe not. Longer growing season, at least by a few weeks? Yeah, I'd take that.
But theres a few hundred million impoverished Asian folks who'll be looking for new homes if the sea does rise by a meter or so in the next century. Our coastal cities might not fare too well either.
We'll find out, one way or another!
If it takes until Next Century NO we wont cause we will all be dead...I am tough but not that tough...I cant hold out anouther 90 or so years.....maybe my great great grandkids will find out but I havent seen them yet...so perhaps they will have figured out a way to prevent this flooding you speak of...LOL no one and I mean no one on earth is gonna spend themselves into a poor house on the threat of the "next century or so"
__________________
Many of life's failures
are people who did not realize how close they were to success
when they gave up.

-Thomas A Edison
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture