Arctic not completely dark in winters anymore - Page 2 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > Specialty Forums > General Chat

General Chat Sponsored by LPC Survival


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #21  
Old 12/28/10, 07:05 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gratiot Co, Michigan
Posts: 2,445
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shygal View Post
You are wasting your time, NL. Some people won't believe that man has had any effect on the planet no matter what. Yes the earth changes, it always has and always will. But to say man has had absolutely no effect on anything is absurd.

Accoording to the Sagas (and general history, too)from 1000 to nearly 1400 AD, Greenland was able to support horse, cattle and sheep at both of the Norse settlements. After that, the climate got colder and the Norse were not able to adapt.

Climate is cyclical, nothing more, nothing less. I am sure that Krakatoa, Pinatubo and St. Hellens have had more to do with climate change than all the people in the world.

We contribute, but those who say that man is the SOLE reason for climate change is absurd (and yes, there are people who insist on that, EarthFirst! and other eco-terrorists come to mind)
__________________
Roger

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas Gallowglass
Amoung the things I've learned in life are these two tidbits...
1) don't put trust into how politicians explain things
2) you are likely to bleed if you base your actions upon 'hope'...
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12/28/10, 07:11 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Gratiot Co, Michigan
Posts: 2,445
And those terrible Inuits, increasing global warming by using their snowmobiles!

They need to go back to dogsleds! (and yes, I am kidding).
__________________
Roger

Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas Gallowglass
Amoung the things I've learned in life are these two tidbits...
1) don't put trust into how politicians explain things
2) you are likely to bleed if you base your actions upon 'hope'...
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12/28/10, 07:54 AM
deaconjim's Avatar
Appalachian American
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW VA
Posts: 10,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by naturelover View Post
That's not the reason why it's being reported but it's true Canada will not be contributing any more money for climate studies until 2017.



Here's another one, but not about the Arctic this time - this is from the international climate change conference in Cancun in November:

http://www.cbc.ca/world/story/2010/1...n-climate.html

" The brutal heat waves that killed thousands of Europeans in 2003 and choked Russia earlier this year will seem like average summers in the future as the Earth continues to warm, the UN weather agency said Tuesday.

The last decade confirmed scientific predictions from 20 years ago that temperatures will rise and storms will become more fierce — and those trends are likely to continue, said Ghassam Asrar, who heads the climate research centre at the World Meteorological Organization.

Although climate science is still evolving and learning from current patterns, Asrar said, government planners should prepare for a warming world.

In 2003, an estimated 35,000 to 40,000 people died from heat-related ailments or incidents in what was the hottest summer since 1540. Russia's summer this year was the warmest this century and ignited peat fires in the forests around Moscow that suffocated the capital for weeks. Temperatures, in degrees Celsius, soared into the 30s in normally chilly Siberia.

Several parts of the world experienced freakish or extreme weather this year, the WMO said. Records for low temperature were shattered in hundreds of U.S. locations, and heavy snowfall disrupted air and road traffic in Europe, the U.S. and China. Pakistan suffered floods that killed 1,700 people and displaced 20 million people. China also had unusually high temperatures, floods and landslides........."


Oh, oh, it looks like it's happening again this winter too!

.
Here's another story about the conference in Cancun:

Irony: Global Warming Conference in Cancun Hit with Record Cold TempsBy marfdrat on December 11, 2010

Remember the plan, no matter what happens, it's caused by Global Warming. Cold, hot, wet, dry, stormy or calm, Global Warming causes it all, including volcanos and earthquakes.
__________________
Only the paranoid survive.

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

Dispatches From The Conservative Underground
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12/28/10, 08:15 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by deaconjim View Post
Here's another story about the conference in Cancun:

Irony: Global Warming Conference in Cancun Hit with Record Cold TempsBy marfdrat on December 11, 2010

Remember the plan, no matter what happens, it's caused by Global Warming. Cold, hot, wet, dry, stormy or calm, Global Warming causes it all, including volcanos and earthquakes.
No, no, no!

Note in the original article, it's called climate change. Sorta silly to call it global warming in the midst of record cold.

You've got to pay attention, DeaconJim.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12/28/10, 08:48 AM
deaconjim's Avatar
Appalachian American
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: SW VA
Posts: 10,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by Txsteader View Post
No, no, no!

Note in the original article, it's called climate change. Sorta silly to call it global warming in the midst of record cold.

You've got to pay attention, DeaconJim.
Why don't we just call it 'snake oil' and be done with it?
__________________
Only the paranoid survive.

I carry a gun because a cop is too heavy.

Dispatches From The Conservative Underground
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 12/28/10, 09:15 AM
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 4,332
Quote:
Originally Posted by naturelover View Post
And last but not least before I say goodnight, here's a good explanation for why some of you are snowed under and freezing now, not in spite of global warming, but because of global warming.

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/26/op..._r=2&src=twrhp

.
And here is a rebuttal to that very same NYT article, explaining why they get their facts and findings.
http://www.climatechangedispatch.com...new-york-times
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 12/28/10, 09:24 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 8,772
Quote:
Originally Posted by deaconjim View Post
Why don't we just call it 'snake oil' and be done with it?
LOL, in light of the Climategate emails and the UN's wealth-redistribution plot, I'd say that would be a more accurate term.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 12/28/10, 09:36 AM
arabian knight's Avatar
Miniature Horse lover
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,116
You got that right.
__________________
Oh my, dishes yet to wash and dry

See My Pictures at
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/0903/arabianknight/
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 12/28/10, 09:37 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 4,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shygal View Post
You are wasting your time, NL. Some people won't believe that man has had any effect on the planet no matter what. Yes the earth changes, it always has and always will. But to say man has had absolutely no effect on anything is absurd.
I don't believe I've heard anyone say that man has no effect, just not enough to make the kind of difference the GCC crowds want to believe that we have.

By the same token, the climate change proponents refuse to accept that it's at all cyclical, and insist that every thing is caused by man's interference in the world. If the temp goes up, if it goes down, if it's too wet, if it's too dry, if it's wet here and dry there, if it's cold here and warm there, it's ALL man-made climate change. How convenient.

I will be 50 years old in a few days, and AS LONG AS I CAN REMEMBER, there have been areas in drought, areas in flood, areas with higher than normal temps, and areas with lower than normal temps, ALL IN THE SAME YEAR. Then the areas of floods and droughts, etc. changes the next year. It CYCLES.
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 12/28/10, 09:58 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Missouri Ozarks
Posts: 5,069
Interesting how the AGW proponents always seem to make a big point about how climate isnt weather and that you cant look at whats happening in your neck of the woods as any proof AGW isnt happening....and yet...they so readily accept a localized warm weather pattern or anecdotal observations by indigenous people as supporting proof of AGW. Even the IPCC acknowledges that there hasnt been a net increase in temps since 1998 and though 2010 was touted as being one (if not the) warmest years on record....it looks like the arctic storms in the northern hemisphere and extreme cold in the southern hemisphere will probably make 2010 somewhat less. So is that proof AGW is true..untrue? or is it just part of a cycle for this year? No doubt it will be hailed as proof of AGW regardless by some but something just smacks of desperation when this is the best that can be presented.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 12/28/10, 10:43 AM
mnn2501's Avatar
Dallas
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: N of Dallas, TX
Posts: 10,058
Quote:
Originally Posted by naturelover View Post
Hey you guys, I'm just posting what's being officially reported happening with the climate in the Arctic now for those people on the board who are interested in knowing about it. What you do with the information is up to you, I'm just posting the reports.
.
Come on; Rush, Glenn and Faux Newz have all told them GW is bunk, so of course they're going to make snide remarks.
I'm suprised that haven't blamed Obama yet for this particular phenominon.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12/28/10, 10:54 AM
Shygal's Avatar
Unreality star
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: New York
Posts: 9,894
I dont think Ive heard ANYONE here say its "solely" man that is doing it. But I have heard those here say that nothing man has done, has contributed
__________________
Recognize the beauty in things, in creation, even when thats difficult to do.
Be loving, show compassion. Create while we're here.
Enjoy this life, be in this life but not be of it.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12/28/10, 11:31 AM
Wags's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Willamette Valley, Oregon
Posts: 5,492
Astrophysicist and meteorologist Piers Corbyn accurately predicted the record cold temps affecting Europe this winter. He says that the "globally warming" is based on fraudulent data and he says that "global cooling" is actually what is taking place and that he expects it to continue for another 25 years. He also says that climate temps affect carbon - not the other way around.


Pier's cyclic theory makes sense to me, as I am already aware of the cyclic nature of the climate in Oregon. Twenty or so year of dry followed by twenty or so years of wet. The state meteorologist that noted that cycle lost his job for speaking out against the global warming non-science.
__________________
Wags Ranch Nigerians


"The Constitution says to promote the general welfare, not to provide welfare!" ~ Lt. Col Allen West
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12/28/10, 11:31 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Posts: 5,886
Hasn't this subject been beaten to death already? All I know is that if I give money to the World Wildlife Fund the iceberg that the polar bear is clinging to will somehow get bigger. I think they do it with mirrors.
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12/28/10, 11:55 AM
Bearfootfarm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Eastern North Carolina
Posts: 33,479
Quote:
But I have heard those here say that nothing man has done, has contributed
Mostly what I hear is nothing Man can do will STOP it from changing

It's happening on Mars too
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...s-warming.html

Quote:
"The long-term increase in solar irradiance is heating both Earth and Mars," he said.
__________________
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12/28/10, 11:58 AM
FeralFemale's Avatar
Bitter Clinger
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 4,762
Quote:
Arctic not completely dark in winters anymore
At least they pulled out a legit GW-linked explanation for this, unlike the folks who tried to say we were getting more earthquakes and volcanic eruptions due to GW...
__________________
"Let not him who is houseless pull down the house of another; but let him labor diligently and build one for himself, thus by example assuring that his own shall be safe from violence when built."
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12/28/10, 12:12 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Doomed
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12/28/10, 12:13 PM
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: PA
Posts: 5,769
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shygal View Post
You are wasting your time, NL. Some people won't believe that man has had any effect on the planet no matter what. Yes the earth changes, it always has and always will. But to say man has had absolutely no effect on anything is absurd.
You are correct!

I believe NL is wasting her time.. Man made global warming is a fallacy and a myth. In 1922 they blamed cattle ranchers for global warming, yet we are still here. In 1908 they blamed cattle ranchers also, but the reality was a meteor that struck in Siberia.

Yet you and others continue to blame man for this.. Amazing how gullible some are. The only thing that is consistent in all these global warming articles is the desire for MORE MONEY AND CONTROL.

Gee I wonder why we are having colder then normal temperatures for the last month?
I know it is man-made global warming, yet at the same time if we have warmer temperatures then it is from man-made global warming..

So since there is nothing that isn't a cause of man-made global warming, that proves it isn't science.

Every solution that the liberal left comes up with calls for more of taxpayers money and giving up more control of our lives.. So this also tells me that it isn't science and is about money and control..

If there is a solution that doesn't give the Government more control or more of our tax dollars, then go for it..

But I'm TAXED OUT! Enough of the lies and false science.
__________________
Pennsylvania Constitution, Article 1 Section 21 "The Right of the Citizens to bear arms in defense of themselves and the State shall not be questioned"
www.pafoa.org
http://www.45thpacok.com
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 12/28/10, 12:51 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: southern illinois
Posts: 6,713
The fossil fuels we are burning represent hundreds of millions of years of concentrated energy. And we are releasing all that energy back into the atmosphere in a few short generations. Anyone with any sense should know this will affect the enviornment. Lets not make this a 'leftie vs. rightie' thing. We are not being good stewards of the land.
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 12/28/10, 01:38 PM
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Posts: 265
Quote:
Originally Posted by greg273 View Post
We are not being good stewards of the land.
I have to agree with that.
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture