Smoking Inside with Pets or Children Present ?? - Page 10 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > General Homesteading Forums > Countryside Families


Like Tree1Likes

Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #181  
Old 11/01/11, 08:44 PM
NickieL's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Station
Posts: 14,761
here, the smokers have to pay more now and the non-smokers get a really good discount. You also get a discount if you are withen normal body weight, BP, cholesteral, etc. If you are in the good levels of all that, you save 40 dollars a pay check. Everyone has to take a blood test to prove they don't smoke for the discount. And for those that want to quit, they offer help, free, to quit, including meds to help.
__________________
It's not that I don't like mankind, I just like nature a whole lot more.
  #182  
Old 11/01/11, 08:48 PM
MO_cows's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: W Mo
Posts: 9,197
Quote:
Originally Posted by snoozy View Post
This idea that private businesses are being forced against their will to ban smoking is delusional.

Tell all the local mom and pop bar owners who have gone out of business they are delusional. In the last couple years, a smoking ban was passed in Kansas City and some of the suburbs. Most of the little places who couldn't afford to put in a patio or didn't have a suitable facility to do so have gone bust. A lot of jobs were lost. Friend of mine plays in a band and the first 6 months of the ban, they lost about 10 gigs at smaller clubs that had closed. One place was in the news, they were fined because the owner permitted smoking after the ban. I guess they paid the fine with delusional money??

Non-smokers are in the majority in this country. Therefore, it is good business practice to keep one's business environment attractive to the majority.

Subway is the "majority" restaurant in this country. So by your logic, the rest of them should just shut down because we only need the majority.

Smokers have higher associated health costs, and so it is good business practice to not have smokers on the payroll.

Not true! Some people are more sensitive to smoke than others. Some brands have more harmful additives than others. I happen to be one of the "hardy" ones. I recently had a doctors visit to check out a suspicous skin growth, and it came to light it had been SIX YEARS since I had been in to see the GP. And yes, I smoke. The health care system didn't incur any extra expense on my account, and I am one of MILLIONS. I also have more sick days in reserve at work than my non-smoking colleagues. Sorry not to fit your convenient stereotype!

Smokers take more breaks to feed their habit, and so it is good business to not have smokers on the payroll.

Again, not true. For every smoker in the workplace, you can find internet surfers, people who yak instead of work, etc. One's work ethic has nothing to do with smoking.

Buildings and cars absorb tobacco smoke and lower resale value, so it is good business sense not to allow smoking inside these places.

Not for you to decide! It is up to the owners of the property. And do you seriously believe a used car that has been properly detailed has less value because someone might have smoked in it at some time in the past?

The only positive thing about secondhand smoke is that it makes the innocent bystander really hate smoking.
The propaganda war has made people really hate smoking. And probably a few experiences with rude, inconsiderate smokers. I have had a lot of experiences with rude and inconsiderate drivers, too, but I'm not quite ready to ban driving.
__________________
It is still best to be honest and truthful; to make the most of what we have; to be happy with the simple pleasures and to be cheerful and have courage when things go wrong.
Laura Ingalls Wilder
  #183  
Old 11/01/11, 08:48 PM
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shygal View Post
Yes it happens, do you enjoy it? Or do you complain about it?
Do you leave and go elsewhere when it happens?
I ignore it, finish my meal, and go home. I do come back to the restaurant if the food warrants it. Crying screaming kids are fairly simple to tune out, maybe it's because I grew up with 9 siblings, or maybe because I have 5 of my own. Generally one can get a pretty good laugh at something silly the little crumb cruncher's do.
  #184  
Old 11/01/11, 08:53 PM
Dorothea's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2004
Location: northern wisconsin
Posts: 887
why is it the smokers are always bashed...we never bash the drinkers..just think if all the smokers quit who would be paying all the extra taxes..how can anyone say 100% positive that you get/got lung cancer from smoking/smokers,,,maybe it was just dealt that way for you..
yes i am a dumb smoker but i don't smoke in door ways,,i don't loss my employer money cause i don't smoke at work..if i did it would be on MY break thats MY time to do as i please,,
so don't judge all of us smokers the way you non smokers are,,,if you came to my home i wouldn't smoke around you,,if i came to your house i wouldn't smoker on your land..
  #185  
Old 11/01/11, 09:04 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Whiskey Flats(Ft. Worth) , Tx
Posts: 8,712
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dorothea View Post
why is it the smokers are always bashed...we never bash the drinkers..just think if all the smokers quit who would be paying all the extra taxes..how can anyone say 100% positive that you get/got lung cancer from smoking/smokers,,,maybe it was just dealt that way for you..
yes i am a dumb smoker but i don't smoke in door ways,,i don't loss my employer money cause i don't smoke at work..if i did it would be on MY break thats MY time to do as i please,,
so don't judge all of us smokers the way you non smokers are,,,if you came to my home i wouldn't smoke around you,,if i came to your house i wouldn't smoker on your land..

.................Truthfully , I don't judge smokers because , I Know how absolutely addictive tobacco IS , and how hard it was for ME too quit ! Allowing smokers the widest possible freedom to enjoy their habit while the smoke just drifts around is a little like trying too keep a cat in a fenced back yard , almost impossible to do , lol . , fordy
  #186  
Old 11/01/11, 09:09 PM
NickieL's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Station
Posts: 14,761
fordy, congrats on quitting.

Dorothea, if what you say you do is true, you would be in the minority of smokers. Every smoker i have known has had no problem forcing others to 'enjoy' thier habbit with others who wern't so happy about it. I litterlly had to THROW a guest out of my house because he refused to take it outside, when I told him repeatedly he could not smoke in my house. And again, those smokers who, for some reason, can't learn to read about not standing near doorways to smoke, when signs ask them not to. Or those smokers who think the world looks pretty if they throw thier butts all over the place on the ground. If people want to poison themselves, kill themselves, harm them selves, drink themselves to death, or smoke, so long as it doesn't affect other people, I have no issues with that.
__________________
It's not that I don't like mankind, I just like nature a whole lot more.
  #187  
Old 11/01/11, 09:28 PM
The cream separator guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Southern MO
Posts: 3,919
Quote:
Originally Posted by MO_cows View Post
Not for you to decide! It is up to the owners of the property. And do you seriously believe a used car that has been properly detailed has less value because someone might have smoked in it at some time in the past?
I won't buy a vehicle that smells like someone lit a bonfire of tobacco in it. It's the owners fault that I won't buy his vehicle that I would have bought if he hadn't smoked.
  #188  
Old 11/01/11, 09:31 PM
Dorothea's Avatar  
Join Date: May 2004
Location: northern wisconsin
Posts: 887
NickeiL what i say is true,,i will not push my smoking on anyone..,but what about drinkers ,,they can have a drink while enjoying their dinner,,then get in a car and drive,yea lets kill a family ,don't see those people bashed we don,t bash them about sick days or how much we have to spend on liver disease or what else they get from drinking..or how they waste time at work recovering from a hang over,, just saying is all
  #189  
Old 11/01/11, 09:34 PM
NickieL's Avatar  
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Lake Station
Posts: 14,761
dor, we do bash drunk drivers. I can't stand someone who would do that. However this topic is about smoking. And with the liver disease, they are at least doing that to just themselves. Thier kids won't get liver disease from second hand drinking. But I agree, they should never get behind the wheel of a car while intoxicated, its why it's against the law! The day my Dh quit drinking I celebrated. I hate to see people harming themselves...I hate to see them harm innocent people near them even more, no matter what the addiction is.
__________________
It's not that I don't like mankind, I just like nature a whole lot more.
  #190  
Old 11/01/11, 09:36 PM
The cream separator guy
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Southern MO
Posts: 3,919
I wonder what would happen if people started smoking tobacco instead of cigarettes...
  #191  
Old 11/01/11, 09:45 PM
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Whiskey Flats(Ft. Worth) , Tx
Posts: 8,712
[QUOTE=NickieL;5488419]fordy, congrats on quitting.

..................Thanks , fordy
  #192  
Old 11/01/11, 10:17 PM
wr wr is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 11,808
Dorothea, I'm much like you. I don't smoke in my own home or vehicle so I would never consider smoking in someone else's home or vehicle. If I'm at an outdoor function where I feel I would like to smoke, I remove myself from the group to light up and I pick up my darned butt, put it in my purse or pocket until I can dispose of it properly. I'm allowed smoke breaks at work and I was given the office closest to the back door so I could sneak out for a quick one but I figure that means I'm taking breaks that the non smokers aren't so I start work an hour earlier which more than makes up for my breaks.
  #193  
Old 11/01/11, 10:18 PM
gaucli's Avatar  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 354
Quote:
Originally Posted by soulsurvivor View Post
I've been waiting for someone to mention the second hand smoke issues of burning wood as an alternate heat source. No takers?
  #194  
Old 11/01/11, 10:53 PM
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: KY
Posts: 12,636
Quote:
Originally Posted by gaucli View Post
Thanks for the thumb up. I'd like to hear from everyone on this but I understand it might not be a topic that fits in this thread.
__________________
There are endless combinations of truth.
  #195  
Old 11/02/11, 12:15 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by Heritagefarm View Post
I wonder what would happen if people started smoking tobacco instead of cigarettes...
Ummmmmmmmmmm I'm confused?????? Cigarettes are tobacco. Maybe you are talking cigars, or pipes, instead of cigarettes?
  #196  
Old 11/02/11, 12:25 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by snoozy View Post
This idea that private businesses are being forced against their will to ban smoking is delusional.
SAY WHAT????? delusional????? The laws are very clear, in the states that have them. It is against the law, in most states, to smoke in restaurants, and many if not all bars. This is not delusional, this is a fact. Last I checked those restaurants and bars were primarily private businesses.
  #197  
Old 11/02/11, 12:37 AM
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kitsap Co, WA
Posts: 3,025
Just because there is a law does not mean the owners of businesses are against the statutes of that law. A lot of businesses are happy to be able to protect their workers' and their own health. A lot of businesses are happy that they no longer have to provide for tobacco addicts a separate section of their premises. A lot of business owners are thrilled that they can't be blamed for the changes, and are very thrilled that they don't have to be nauseous in the workplace or go hang their clothes outside overnight to get the stink off of them...
  #198  
Old 11/02/11, 12:37 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoxyWench View Post
snoozy...agree...

i also think smoking in restuaunts for example isnt fair unless you hire people that are 100% specifially absolutly ok breathing in second hand smoke that are hired specifically for smoking tables so a waitress who doesnt want to be around it doesnt have to be...
It's not like the owner went out and kidnapped someone to work for them. That server applied for the job, in most cases that means going to the business and submitting an application. They see an ashtray, or people smoking, and that don't want to work around that stuff, go get a different job.
  #199  
Old 11/02/11, 12:39 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 491
Quote:
Originally Posted by snoozy View Post
Just because there is a law does not mean the owners of businesses are against the statutes of that law. A lot of businesses are happy to be able to protect their workers' and their own health. A lot of businesses are happy that they no longer have to provide for tobacco addicts a separate section of their premises. A lot of business owners are thrilled that they can't be blamed for the changes, and are very thrilled that they don't have to be nauseous in the workplace or go hang their clothes outside overnight to get the stink off of them...
This might be true to some degree, but it also punishes people who would like to cater to smokers. As far as being blamed for making changes, I'd say those owners are cowards.
  #200  
Old 11/02/11, 12:40 AM
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Kitsap Co, WA
Posts: 3,025
Personally, I think that tobacco is the Native Americans' revenge. Unfortunately, many of them are also victims of tobacco addiction.
Closed Thread




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:03 PM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture