Quote:
Originally Posted by LisaInN.Idaho
Maybe I should put them both in contact with you and you can give the low-down. You do after all have that IQ of 130 (!!!) Who actually posts that kind of thing?
|
LOL! Well, I do, when my intelligence is being questioned!
I really don't care what you do with your kids. You're a good parent, you seem genuinely concerned about your family's health, and I wish you the best.
But, I'm no less a good parent, and I'm no less concerned about my family's health just because my parenting decisions are different from yours.
The requirement for this vaccine to get "out there" is that it created antibodies in 40% of the people who get it., with 70% of those people receiving complete resistance. That equates to less than 30% of the people who get the vaccine actually being completely resistant to the virus.
This is one of those situations where...there are risks and benefits. I can risk my children getting GBS, which I believe is a valid risk based on what happened the last time a vaccine for this strand of flu was issued. The benefit is a 30% chance they will receive immunity from this strand of flu.
For me, the risks outweigh the benefits. That's just my decision, though. I'm not suggesting everyone agree with me, but I don't expect to be shot down because I've made this decision.
I would still be interested in knowing what is being done differently in the development this vaccine than the one that was given in '76. Does anyone have any information on that? Because that vaccine was definitely not a good idea, so before I get this one, I'd like to know what's different about it.