E85 In older Gas Tractors - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > Country Living Forums > Shop Talk

Shop Talk Get your mechanical questions answered here!


Like Tree2Likes
  • 1 Post By plowjockey
  • 1 Post By fantasymaker

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #1  
Old 09/17/12, 05:22 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NW Missouri
Posts: 105
E85 In older Gas Tractors

I was wondering if anyone out there has run e85 in older gas tractors. Getting ready for harvest and fall field work and regular gas is $3.76 e85 is at the $3.00 mark. I will burn appox. 50 - 60 gallons for fall work that could be a net savings of $45-50 bucks which isn't much but when your budget for fuel is based on $2.25 rate its a lot. Please don't rail on my question I'm not wanting to hear the politics of ethanol just simple question has anyone tried running e85 and what results did you have. By the way I have a D-17 Allis.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09/17/12, 08:22 AM
Travis in Louisiana's Avatar
Clinton, Louisiana
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 1,688
I don't see no problem with running the e85 in the tractor. You may want to put STABIL FOR ETHANOL in the tank as well. If the engine knocks, which I don't think it will, dump in some octane booster.
__________________
Life......Is What You Make Of It
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09/18/12, 05:38 AM
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,693
No direct experience with the precise scenario you describe. Few general cautions though. Ethanol makes a good solvent of crud, so if your tank if cruddy, it may well come loose and plug your filter. Old rubber lines may not hold up well to the ethanol, and may need to be replaced. Crud in the carburetor bowl may well get floated off and plug up a jet. Beware of parking outside. Ethanol will absorb water, until the mixture won't combust in the engine. Generally works out ok with vehicles and equipment stored inside, but long term outside storage, not so good.

I'd be game to try it myself, but I'd be allocating some repair time in anticipation.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09/18/12, 06:38 AM
alleyyooper's Avatar
keeper of the bees
HST_MODERATOR.png
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,307
Talking

We have seen reports of hours per gallon of work being less than fuel with just 15% ethanol but one one has published exact figures that I have seen.

I wonder once you add the cost of stabuil anfd octane boost if you saved any money in the end?

Al
__________________
Garden View Apiaries. Where the view is as sweet as the honey.
A member of SEMBA & MBA.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09/18/12, 08:21 AM
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Indiana, USA
Posts: 12,502
E85 is nearly 30% less efficient than gasoline, so from a savngs point it might be a wash.

I'd be more concerned about the possible damage to the fuel system.
zant likes this.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09/18/12, 09:12 AM
coolrunnin's Avatar  
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,571
One of my pickups can use E85. I loose 2-3 miles per gallon running E85 so the price difference has to be significant to pay out and rarely works to my benefit.

Also have read reports that alcohol isn't compatible with many synthetic rubbers, making your fuel susceptible to damage.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09/18/12, 09:54 AM
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: maine
Posts: 2,324
Quote:
Originally Posted by plowjockey View Post
E85 is nearly 30% less efficient than gasoline, so from a savngs point it might be a wash.

I'd be more concerned about the possible damage to the fuel system.
FWIW- My hwy mileage in the truck went from 23 to 18 when we were switched to 10% ethanol. The guys that service outboards chainsaw etc look like they bit on poo when you ask questions about how to deal with the stuff.


If I had access to 100% gas, I would spend the dinero.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09/18/12, 11:09 AM
fantasymaker's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: IL, right smack dab in the middle
Posts: 6,787
I used to run a IH 340 on ethanol. I had access to a couple of barrels of it to play with.
I started with a tank full of standard unleaded and each time I got down about a gallon I added a gallon of ethanol. I eventally put all 100 gallons in. Im not sure exactly but it must have got close to E-99.99!
It became just a bit harder to start. thats about it.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09/18/12, 12:37 PM
wy_white_wolf's Avatar
Just howling at the moon
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Wyoming
Posts: 5,518
I know it's lengthy but you might want to read this.

E85 vs. Gasoline Comparison Test - Edmunds.com
__________________
If the grass looks greener it is probably over the septic tank. - troy n sarah tx

Our existance here is soley for the expoitation of CMG
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09/18/12, 10:23 PM
idahodave's Avatar  
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: SE Idaho
Posts: 532
If you get real E85 the mixture will be real lean....might cause harm under load. E85 takes about 30% more fuel to air than straight gas.

Flex fuel cars have computers and fuel injection to add more fuel....old tractors don't.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09/18/12, 10:57 PM
fantasymaker's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: IL, right smack dab in the middle
Posts: 6,787
NOW if at some time in the future you need to rebuild that engine put the highest compression pistions in it you can find! your fuel economey will go way WAY up!
lazyBum likes this.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09/19/12, 05:30 AM
alleyyooper's Avatar
keeper of the bees
HST_MODERATOR.png
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 5,307
Talking

You will also get a lot of knocking due to the low octane in todays fuels.

Al
__________________
Garden View Apiaries. Where the view is as sweet as the honey.
A member of SEMBA & MBA.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09/19/12, 08:33 AM
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 799
In your case the gasoline would be more economical, because the amount of energy per dollar is greater. E85 has only between 2/3 and 3/4 the embodied energy as gasoline and you'll burn more of the cheaper E85 to accomplish the same amount of work. Your E85 would have to cost less than 2.80$ to be energy equal to gasoline.

That's assuming that E85 will run properly in the engine at all. I'd say that unless the engine is fuel injected, and designed to distingish between the two fuels, then you shouldn't substitute it. If the engine is carbareted, most likely the fuel needle jets would need to be changed, and the timing altered.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09/24/12, 12:37 PM
"Slick"
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Moving from NM to TX, & back to NM.
Posts: 2,329
Quote:
Originally Posted by wy_white_wolf View Post
I know it's lengthy but you might want to read this.

E85 vs. Gasoline Comparison Test - Edmunds.com
Excellent article BTW, all people should read it.

I have a 2004 Ford Explorer with flex capability, and it too gets really poor mileage on straight E85. Ddefinately more expensive.
__________________
We will meet in the golden city, called the New Jerusalem,
All our pain and all our tears will be no more.....
Reply With Quote
Reply




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:37 PM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture