
04/10/07, 11:27 AM
|
|
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 152
|
|
Number three coilspring traps can be a very useful tool for beaver and its a trap that can be use for other species (coyote, fisher and bobcat) to give it multiple usage. The Bridger #3 actually has a larger jaw span than the #4 double longsprings which can be beneficial for hind foot catches. Every trapper has his preferences in types and sizes of traps, I can tell you that this particuler trap has been one that has produced well fo me.  I have taken a couple of hundred beaver a year for many years and this has been the main tool in doing so. About twelve years ago I tried this trap (bought 2 dozen) made a few adjustments, four coiling, laminated jaws and a reinforced center base plate and then night latching the pan. After that season I started selling of all my other beaver footholds as my catch ratio was better and I found that by uniforming my equipment made me more efficient in setting out and maintaining the line. the other benefit came in storage as I could carry more in smaller areas a benefit any trapper will agree with. The last benefit I want to put on the table is the cost. Not every trapper cam afford some of the beaver specific traps. Some are over $25.00 a trap.
Not all circumstances call for footholds and I do use 330's when called for and I truley prefer these connibears for under ice trapping but in open water the #3 is my trap of choice. I hope this can aid you in your selection and at least inform you that the trap is effective. One thing that you may be told is that it won't hold larger beaver. It has produced several super blanket beaver with weights in the mid seventy's. Good luck, Trapper
__________________
Over 50 yrs. trapping, if I can help answer any question, just email. Served Wisc. as Pres., V.P. and on the Trapper Ed. Committee. On the National level as a Director. Director of the year in 1992.
|