Raw Milk Battle - Page 3 - Homesteading Today
You are Unregistered, please register to use all of the features of Homesteading Today!    
Homesteading Today

Go Back   Homesteading Today > Livestock Forums > Cattle

Cattle For Those Who Like To Have A Cow.


Closed Thread
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Rate Thread
  #41  
Old 03/03/09, 04:58 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mizery
Posts: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlackWillowFarm View Post
I think the real issue being discussed here isn't necessarily raw vs pasteurized.
IMHO The issue here never was raw vs. pasteurized.
Quote:
The issue is more of governmental intrusion into the lives of the farms and farmers who produce food for our nation.
IMHO, Government intrusion would come under unwarranted search and seizure. However your passions may rise or fall in Mr. Holt's behalf, he was in flagrant violation of existing laws.
Quote:
What I see is a "one size fits all approach" from our government which in effect favors the industrial farm. It could be argued that the intention of these regulations is to drive the small farms out of business. It seems to have been quite successful in doing just that.
Aye.... But there's the rub. The "one size fits all" approach only favors those with the deepest pockets, not necessarily the largest producers.

As for intent.... that's a slippery slope. There have been and always will be, Robber Barons, (Special Interest Groups) and politicians by complicity, who push for legislation that limits competition.

As for prevailing financially against big government/business, I see it as more of.... It ain't the size of the dog in the fight.... it's the size of the fight in the dog. No business, however large or small, has the right, in a free market economy, to demand special rights, exemptions or privileges, that would enable itself to gain market share under existing law, without first attempting to change existing law.
Quote:
People like Mr. Nolt have the courage of their convictions to back them up in their actions. Perhaps he acted foolishly, perhaps not. Only time will tell.
I cannot claim any personal knowledge nor relationship with Mr. Nolte. therefore I have no real insight as to his true intentions or motivations. As much as I may, or may not, feel that the actions of the PDA were excessive. Mr. Nolte at the end of the day, was still in violation of existing laws.
Quote:
I doubt I would have been able to stand against the gov't and fight as he has. I lack his courage. How many of us are willing to risk losing everything we worked for and believe in to stand against others who would take it all away? Would you?
To echo your previous statement... Only time will tell.....
Quote:
"In the beginning of a change the patriot is a scarce man, and brave, and hated and scorned. When his cause succeeds, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot." -- Mark Twain
Quote:
Here's a local example of the "one size fits all" approach taken by our government.
My neighbor wants to sell apple cider from his farm. In order to do so legally, he has to install $15,000 worth of equipment and upgrade his processing areas to gov't standards. He can't afford to do that, so he can't sell his cider.
Let's play devil's advocate for a moment...... Your neighbor put the cart before the horse, by growing apples before having the proper equipment in place to make them into cider. As they say.... Poor planning on your part, does not necessarily constitute an emergency on my part.

Let's be real...... Suppose that your neighbor was allowed to produce cider for public consumption without said equipment. Let's also suppose that someone was sickened by said cider. Do you for a moment think that the hordes now clamoring for a sip of his elixir, would not immediately do an about face and be calling for his blood?
Quote:
Shouldn't there be a way for everyone who wants to sell their produce, dairy, meat etc. to be in compliance with regulations, and not be driven out of doing so by the burden of costs and "one size fits all" regulations?
There is a way.... And it is already available to you, your apple growing neighbor, as well as, Mr. Nolte. Educate and enlighten the dumbmasses of citiots and sheeple into seeing the long term effects of hamstringing start up competition. Then, petition, lobby and vote for legislation that is based on common sense.

(Self)righteous law breaking. is still, breaking the law....... Remember.... The difference between a freedom fighter and a terrorist depends upon which side of the issue you are on.

Just sayin'

Last edited by Cotton Picker; 03/03/09 at 05:47 PM.
  #42  
Old 03/03/09, 05:47 PM
willow_girl's Avatar
Very Dairy
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Dysfunction Junction
Posts: 14,603
Quote:
Ronney, if you want to increase your injestion of bacteria as a way of toughening yourself up, be my guest. What works for you could be the death of someone else.
Especially a city person who isn't routinely exposed to pathogens while handling animals and manure, and whose immune system isn't ramped up to deal with such. Ditto the very young or old, and the folks with compromised immune systems, who are especially at risk for food-borne illnesses.
__________________
"I love all of this mud," said no one, ever.
  #43  
Old 03/03/09, 06:20 PM
arabian knight's Avatar
Miniature Horse lover
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by willow_girl View Post
Especially a city person who isn't routinely exposed to pathogens while handling animals and manure, and whose immune system isn't ramped up to deal with such. Ditto the very young or old, and the folks with compromised immune systems, who are especially at risk for food-borne illnesses.
Truer words were never spoken Thank You. What fits for one person doesn't mean ALL people can do the same thing the same way and have the same out come.. Many Can't. Period. Keep the raw stuff on your place and drink all you want, but don't let it out on a unsuspected public.
__________________
Oh my, dishes yet to wash and dry

See My Pictures at
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/0903/arabianknight/
  #44  
Old 03/03/09, 10:51 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mizery
Posts: 292
Wink

Quote:
Originally Posted by haypoint View Post
Ronney, if you want to increase your injestion of bacteria as a way of toughening yourself up, be my guest. What works for you could be the death of someone else.
Quote:
Originally Posted by willow_girl View Post
Especially a city person who isn't routinely exposed to pathogens while handling animals and manure, and whose immune system isn't ramped up to deal with such. Ditto the very young or old, and the folks with compromised immune systems, who are especially at risk for food-borne illnesses.
Quote:
Originally Posted by arabian knight View Post
Truer words were never spoken Thank You. What fits for one person doesn't mean ALL people can do the same thing the same way and have the same out come.. Many Can't. Period. Keep the raw stuff on your place and drink all you want, but don't let it out on a unsuspected public.
In case you all have misinterpreted the original post. The purpose of this thread is not a Raw vs. Pasteurized debate.

Also I would like to point out that Ronnie was not advocating that everyone should drink raw milk, much less his. Besides.... The cost of refrigerated air freight from New Zealand, would make it rather prohibitive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronney View Post
People who are learning have plenty of information available to them and one assumes they have the intelligence to make their own decisions as to how they want their milk. I take a bigger risk every time I drive my car on to the road than I do having a coffee with raw milk in it but I would never tell somebody they should drink raw milk just because I do.
Cheers,
Ronnie
  #45  
Old 03/04/09, 12:07 AM
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 2,808
Quote:
Originally Posted by haypoint View Post
http://www.lancasterfarming.com/node/773
Penn Dept of Agriculture is in favor of raw milk, just they require a license and I assume they do spot checks.

Penn law dictates what dairies must do. PDA enforces the law. Elected officials make the laws.

Will you support me if I ran a restaurant without license and inspections?
Will you support me if I drove a School bus without a CDL driver's license?
Will you support me if I run a Child Daycare without license and inspection?
I just find it sad that there is little we do that isn't dangerous and requires government to watch out for us. We're all dumber and lazier because we all think the gov't will take care of us. All these inspections are just more bailouts. The citizens and consumers get to be lazy, and the government workers are provided jobs and all is well!

By the way, my daughter in college microbiology, grew quite the crop of bacteria from pasteurized milk. I bet that scares the you-know-what out of most of you.
  #46  
Old 03/04/09, 12:23 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,387
When Cotton Picker writes: "During the course of this discussion There has been mention of milk quality as it relates to raw/pasteurized milk, outside the realm of the nutritional pros/cons of either. I believe that this discussion has merit, due to the fact that the wholesomeness, or lack thereof, is the premise that the PDA took with Mr. Nolte. Due to the fact that we are not privy to all of the goings on in Nolte vs.The PDA, it would do no harm to engage in civil discourse about milk borne illnesses and how best to avoid them."

He's on thin ice with the moderator's comment, "WARNING: If this thread goes into yet another raw milk vs pasteurized milk battle I will lock the thread. Keep the focus on the original thread." If we are to continue this debate, we need to shy away from our raw milk/processed milk biases.

Mr. Nolt may be a soft target. How many warnings did he ignore? No one had simpathy for the "Don't taze me, Bro" guy that just wouldn't shut up. If you are under-age, drunk and peeing in the park, plan on going to jail in handcuffs. Not a hard target there, either. Just another victimless crime.

My guess is, that now he's paid his fines, cleaned up his operation, that the Rosa Parks of raw milk products sat back down in the back of the bus. Otherwise, the antigovernment groups would be letting us know.

I'm generally in favor of educating the public as a way of getting laws changed. But to convince the majority of the general public that raw milk is the way to go just ain't right. In the first place, once you step away from your hobby farm buddies, you'll find that the general public doesn't want to hear about the evils of processed milk and are happy with how things are. Then you must face the difficult task of insuring consistantly clean milk on a larger scale.
  #47  
Old 03/04/09, 01:01 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mizery
Posts: 292
Hi DJ in WA,

Thanks for the input. I'll take the liberty to add a few thoughts to yours.

David

Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ in WA View Post
I just find it sad that there is little we do that isn't dangerous and requires government to watch out for us.
Quote:
"When your response to everything that is wrong with the world is to say, 'there ought to be a law,' you are saying that you hold freedom very cheap." -- Dr. Thomas Sowell
Quote:
"If you don't have the right to do something wrong [to yourself], you don't have any rights at all." -- Gene Burns at Faneuil Hall, Boston, 9/29/1996
Quote:
We're all dumber and lazier because we all think the gov't will take care of us. All these inspections are just more bailouts. The citizens and consumers get to be lazy, and the government workers are provided jobs and all is well!
Quote:
"It's important to realize that whenever you give power to politicians or bureaucrats, it will be used for what they want, not for what you want."-- Harry Browne
Quote:
"The world is a dangerous place to live; not because of the people who are evil, but because of the people who don't do anything about it." -- Albert Einstein
Quote:
By the way, my daughter in college microbiology, grew quite the crop of bacteria from pasteurized milk. I bet that scares the you-know-what out of most of you.
That just goes to show that no system is idiot/corruption proof. Just because the processor jumped through all of the regulatory hoops, does not completely guarantee the purity and wholesomeness of the end product.

I saw several slips hanging in one Grade A dairy, in Vermont, selling fluid milk to a processor, warning them to get their bulk tank SCC (Leukocyte) down below 1,000,000 per milliliter. I worked on a nearby farm (About three months) that was running a tank average of 750,000.

To add some perspective to that. 200,000 SCC is considered normal. With 500,000 or above it is held that there is a serious mastitis problem in the herd.

http://www.moomilk.com/archive/u_health_34.htm

Last edited by Cotton Picker; 03/04/09 at 02:40 AM.
  #48  
Old 03/04/09, 01:11 AM
haypoint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Northern Michigan (U.P.)
Posts: 9,387
DJ in WA, oh I get it, you expect the general public to perform bacteria culture on each jug of milk they buy so they won't have the government intrusion that makes us dumb and lazy?

We have the cleanest food in the world and that makes us stupid and lazy? Insuring we have safe clean food is just a scam so, "the government workers are provided jobs and all is well!"

My grandmother died young, leaving a couple young children mother-less due to a milk borne disease. It was common 70 years ago.Let's be careful when we try to re-invent the "good old days", before regulation and other government regulatory intrusions.

Many years ago, I had a classroom experiment that grew cultures from everyday objects and foods. Everything grew bacteria, EXCEPT pasteurized milk.
  #49  
Old 03/04/09, 01:35 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mizery
Posts: 292
Quote:
Originally Posted by haypoint View Post
DJ in WA,My grandmother died young, leaving a couple young children mother-less due to a milk borne disease. It was common 70 years ago.Let's be careful when we try to re-invent the "good old days", before regulation and other government regulatory intrusions.
Haypoint,

Thank you for re-visiting and warning about the dangers of milk borne illnesses.

I somehow get the impression that you believe me to be biased in my opinions in this thread. I hope that I am mistaken.

I believe that it is of the utmost importance to lay all of the evidence I can muster, at the feet of the unlearned. After having done that, to allow them the freedom of making their own decisions. Perhaps you may have overlooked my posting where I gave a link that warned of potential milk born health concerns. I will quote it here for your convenience.

David
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cotton Picker View Post
I've been following the unfolding of this discussion with some interest. It does appear, by all accounts, that Mr. Nolte willfully broke existing PA law by engaging in the selling of raw milk and raw milk products without a permit. However one views, good or bad, the action, or over re-action of the powers that be in PA to Mr. Nolte's violation is a matter of personal conjecture.

Now I'm no advocate of government meddling in private affairs, however, IMHO, oversight is not altogether bad when applied to areas as important as food safety. Would that all raw/commercial milk producers be the epitome of excellent animal husbandry, as well as, sanitation practices.

Sanitation has been stressed by more than a few in their responses here. While this is indeed a critical element to milk quality and wholesomeness, it is in no way the sole source of concern. There are non-environmental, milk borne, potential bad boys as well. The cow herself can be a carrier of illnesses that infect her milk, thereby infecting the consumer of said milk......

http://www.dairyforall.com/milkborne-diseases.php

I'm not a flag waver for either side of the raw/pasteurized debate, I've had both. If you have a penchant for drinkin' yer own, raw, fresh squeezed.... Go for it. I just feel that if you are selling milk for public consumption, you need to fully appreciate the negative potential health concerns, as well as, the positive health benefits of milk, be it raw or pasteurized and work with those who's job it is to insure a safe food supply.

IMHO, it might just be better to go a little overboard on the safe side, (permitting, oversight) than to be the cause of people becoming sick. 'Cause we all know, outside of the moral implications, if you poison the public.... Your cows will be able to use your posterior for a pasture... If ya know what I mean.

Last edited by Cotton Picker; 03/04/09 at 02:08 AM.
  #50  
Old 03/04/09, 06:54 AM
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 6,844
Folks you are threading very close to my locking down this thread. I said earlier I don't want this to become yet another food fight between the raw vs pasteurized folks. Keep the thread to the point. As I see it: Does a state have a right to regulate the sale of milk and milk products within its boundries?
  #51  
Old 03/04/09, 07:19 AM
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 2,558
[QUOTE=haypoint;3661145]
My grandmother died young, leaving a couple young children mother-less due to a milk borne disease. It was common 70 years ago.Let's be careful when we try to re-invent the "good old days", before regulation and other government regulatory intrusions.
QUOTE]

My grandmother also died very young leaving 3 children under the age of 12. She didn't die of any milk borne disease, she died of septisemia as a result of childbirth and the baby died too. This was back in the days when "homebirth" wasn't an option, it was a fact of life and more women died in childbirth than they ever did from milk diseases. Then "progress" took over and women went to hospital to birth and infant and mother mortality dropped. Then the modern woman decided that the hospital was too antiseptic and wanted homebirth so it became an option. But when it became an option it also came with guidelines. Those guidelines minimise the risk but don't negate it and women who choose this option are made fully aware of the fact - but they have the right to choose and the risk is theirs. I put the sale of raw milk into the same category. This discussion is nothing to do with raw milk being better or worse for a person than pastuerized milk bought in the supermarket, it has a lot to do with a person's right to choose what they eat and drink and sensible guidelines being put in place for the sale of such produce and for the choices to be made available.

And thankyou David for reading my posts properly.

Cheers,
Ronnie
  #52  
Old 03/04/09, 08:35 AM
arabian knight's Avatar
Miniature Horse lover
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: West Central WI.
Posts: 21,107
Quote:
Originally Posted by DJ in WA View Post
By the way, my daughter in college microbiology, grew quite the crop of bacteria from pasteurized milk.
Big deal, that is why milk "sours" and spoils after a length of time, it always has it always will and the shelve life on Unpasteurized is WAY less~! THAT should scare the rest of you. There is milk that is "Shelve Stable" it is called "Ultra Pasteurized" and does not need to be the frig. CAN'T do that with raw milk.
__________________
Oh my, dishes yet to wash and dry

See My Pictures at
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/0903/arabianknight/
  #53  
Old 03/04/09, 05:54 PM
In Remembrance
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 6,844
OK, you were warned.
Closed Thread



Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:04 AM.
Contact Us - Homesteading Today - Archive - Privacy Statement - Top - ©Carbon Media Group Agriculture